Climate Change and Regional Conflicts: A Double Threat to Human Security – By: Javeria Mukhtar
Introduction
Across[1] South Asia and acutely in Pakistan, climate shocks and regional strife are intersecting in ways that erode safety, dignity, and livelihoods at their foundations. Human security, a human-centered approach that prioritizes protection against threats to survival, welfare, and dignity, can help account for why the intersection of extreme weather events and precarious conflict dynamics is so destabilizing. Climate change is no longer a theoretical threat it is a lived experience that reconfigures everyday lives, undermines development progress, and magnifies vulnerabilities built up over decades.
In the 2025 [2]monsoon season alone, Pakistan’s northern provinces offered stark reminders of this twin threat. Flash floods and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) swept through villages in Chitral, Swat and Gilgit-Baltistan, revealing how heat-stressed mountains, unregulated deforestation, rampant encroachment of riverbeds, and an endemic inability to manage can turn natural disasters into outright human disasters. Infrastructure disintegrated, agricultural land disappeared overnight, and livelihoods were destroyed in a few hours. When Punjab rivers overflowed and emergency evacuations reached a fever pitch, the disaster struck once again normal citizens paid the ultimate price for decades of shortsightedness in risk reduction, bad planning, and lax enforcement of regulations.
What is so terrifying about these crises is that they do not happen in vacuum. They overlap with current political instability, resource conflict, and local grievances, adding to tensions already brewing beneath the surface. Instead of breaking cycles of vulnerability, Pakistan’s developmental trajectory since independence reveals how thousands of projects, policies, and commissions have largely failed to build resilience. The result is a bitter paradox: while vast sums have been spent in the name of “progress,” people on the ground remain perpetually unprepared. The nation is repeatedly told about preparation and response but rarely about precaution, prevention, and sustainable resilience. This cycle of reaction instead of foresight has characterized Pakistan’s climate policy, and the results are now impossible to avoid.
Human Security and Why It Matters Now
The[3] human security approach, originally outlined in systematic form in UNDP’s 1994 Human Development Report, recasts security in terms of seven interconnected “clusters”: economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community, and political security. It holds that absence from want, fear, and indignity are as fundamental as state sovereignty. The Commission on Human Security (2003) subsequently underscored the responsibility to protect and empower individuals subjected to interdependent threats. This is a critical lens in climate-stressed areas, where droughts, floods, and displacement echo through employment, food systems, social fabric, and political stability.
Of these clusters, environmental security is central to today. The IPCC AR6 (WGII) establishes with high confidence that climate change erodes human security by damaging ecosystems, exacerbating water and food insecurity, and interacting with social and political stressors including risk of conflict. Defined this way, Pakistan’s 2025 floods are not merely “natural disasters”; they are human security crises that spill over all seven clusters.
A Risk Multiplier: How Climate Stress Feeds Conflict Dynamics
Climate change hardly “causes” conflict by itself. Instead, it is a risk multiplier, amplifying pre-existing vulnerabilities and deepening long-simmering grievances. Far from a single, direct trigger, it exacerbates pre-existing constraints on resources particularly access to fertile land and water enforces population displacement, and drives already under-resourced or weakened institutions closer to the edge. The academic literature, as well as the IPCC’s evaluations and research conducted by the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), persistently highlights that climate distress is compounded by governance failure, poverty, and inequality to amplify insecurity. Across South Asia, and especially in Pakistan, these mechanisms are glaringly apparent. The Indus River basin, the livelihood for almost 240 million, is facing unheard-of stress. Increased glacial melting in the Himalaya–Karakoram–Hindukush region generates seasonal surges and long-term volatility in the flows of water. Downstream, unbridled development along floodplains, sand mining, and encroachment on riverbeds exacerbate the effects of climate-induced disasters such as flash floods and GLOFs. Such disruptions are not only hydrological they are deeply political. Neighboring communities vie for diminishing water supplies, agriculturalists experience irrigation deficits, and Pakistani provinces (Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) more and more contest water assignments under the 1991 Indus Water Accord.
Transboundary politics raises the stakes. The Indus Waters Treaty (1960), traditionally a model of India-Pakistan conflict resolution, is now strained as both nations struggle with uncertain flows, dam building, and securitization of water management. Climate uncertainty thus fuels nationalist propaganda, suspicion, and occasional diplomatic rows. Apart from interstate relations, climate shocks also amplify ordinary insecurities: hikes in food prices trigger city streets protests, aggressive land use increases in slums, and displaced persons become more exposed to crime, extortion, and militant recruitment. Thus, climate change accentuates the very pressures inequality, migration, resource scarcity that have the potential to light the fire of unrest or exacerbate fragility. Without changing governance, the climate crisis in South Asia will not only be an environmental but a deep security dilemma
2025: Chitral, Swat and Gilgit-Baltistan Case Studies in Environmental (In)Security
Chitral, Swat Flash Floods and the Cost of Maladaptation
Sudden[4] spikes in the Swat River in June and July–August 2025 washed away tourists and locals, obliterated houses and roads, and severed health service access. The reporting identifies climatic forces (heavy rain, cloudbursts) and maladaptation deforestation, unauthorized buildings along riverbanks, and weak enforcement of land-use regulations that converted a hazard into a mass-casualty disaster. In Chitral, vulnerable mountain communities faced heightened risks from flash floods and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), demonstrating how environmental degradation and poor planning can transform climate-related hazards into major human security crises. These cases illustrate how environmental insecurity is not driven by climate change alone but is amplified by governance failures and unsustainable development practices.
Gilgit-Baltistan GLOFs, Mud-Dammed Lakes, and Chronic Exposure
In August 2025, a Ghizer mountain mudslide blocked the river, creating a 7-kilometer-long impromptu lake, and endangering downstream settlements with destructive outburst flooding. Within days, officials confirmed two giant lakes created following glacial outbursts, and humanitarian reports listed extensive damage to homes, schools, bridges, and power/communications infrastructure in GB’s districts. These are classic GLOF signs in fast-warming, glacier-heavy country. The trend is not “one-off.” Mappings and explainers this year depict extra-heavy-than-normal rains and sudden cloudbursts claiming hundreds across the country, with the northern districts ranking among the worst affected. Analyses pin the blame squarely on melting glaciers and denuded forests as aggravating factors in Pakistan’s repeated flood tragedies.
Punjab’s Rivers in Spate Downstream Risks
As[5] the summer progressed, the Ravi, Sutlej, and Chenab rivers reached record highs, resulting in mass evacuations in Punjab. Downstream flooding is the inevitable tail risk when upstream basins are destabilized due to heat, cloudbursts, and debris flows. In the absence of basin-wide planning and strict zoning, every surge increases the social and economic cost many times.
“Preparation” Without Precaution: Seventy-Five Years of Lessons Unlearned
The[6] disaster playbook of Pakistan has long prioritized response and “preparedness” messaging over the more difficult, politically expensive task of precautionary risk reduction: policing building codes, moving settlements off active floodplains, reducing deforestation and mining, preserving wetlands as sponges, and investing in resilient infrastructure where people reside. The consequence is a repetition of alarms-and-sirens every monsoon, followed by short-term relief and another back to business-as-usual. Reporting from Swat in 2025 is harsh: unauthorized construction, poor environmental assessments, and inefficient urban planning amplified losses classic maladaptation. If thousands of “projects” do not translate into documented decreases in exposure and vulnerability, they are, quite literally, waste.
The Human Security Ledger: How the Seven Clusters Are Unraveling
1. Environmental Security
The ecosystems in the mountains are under growing pressure owing to glacial melting, precipitation changes, and increased incidents of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs). Retreating glaciers result in the formation of new lakes behind moraine or ice dams, which could lead to catastrophic flooding if these natural barriers fail to hold. HKH, comprising GB and upper KP, is especially vulnerable to this phenomenon. In addition to GLOFs, there has been an escalation in the incidence of landslides, flash floods, and cloudbursts in light of erratic monsoons and deforestation. Besides becoming increasingly common, these phenomena have become more severe in terms of their intensity. Vegetation cover has been diminished by unauthorized construction, overgrazing, and unsustainable harvesting practices, causing instability on slopes. This contributes to soil erosion, reducing the capacity of the rivers and contributing to increased flood risk. Another consequence of environmental change has been the alteration in flow patterns for several rivers as a result of changing climatic conditions. This results in unpredictable rivers as sources of irrigation and drinking water for people living near them, as well as posing challenges to hydropower generation that Pakistan relies on heavily.
2. Food Security
Environmental destruction results in food insecurity directly. Landslides and flooding of terraces in the mountainous region wipe out arable land available for cultivation by farmers. Lack of accessibility due to road damage cuts off seed supplies, market outlets, and food aid. This process goes on, making people go into debt and migrate, hence undermining rural agriculture. Lower down, flooding and siltation of crops in the plains of Punjab and Sindh ruin standing crops and irrigation channels, hence delaying planting in the next season. Disruption of logistics in supplying goods from farms to warehousing causes price hikes in cities. The most affected perishable goods are fruits, vegetables, and milk products. Additionally, climate change impacts crop yield and labor force need, hence undermining food insecurity among the population in the villages. Food aid and importation of food are some of the ways of coping, but without solving environmental problems in terms of watershed management, and floodplain development, long-term security is weak.
Other Clusters
- Economic security: Transport washouts, tourism collapse, and debt cycles.
- Health security: Water contamination, trauma, and treatment disruptions.
- Personal/community security: Displacement and rising exploitation risks.
- Political security: Institutional credibility eroding amid maladaptation and politicized relief processes.
From Slogans to Systems: What State Action Must Do—Now
To[7] end the cycle, Pakistan needs to transition from performative preparedness to enforced precaution. That means a change in policy, financing, and governance. Seven priorities are most critical: First, enforce flood-plain zoning and riparian setbacks. Floodplains are natural spill zones; development on them ensures devastation. In Swat, riverbank hotels and markets disappeared in seconds. Relocation, removal of unsafe buildings, and strict prohibition against new development are necessary. Second, embrace ecosystem-based adaptation. Solid concrete walls cannot stem floods. Reforestation, hillside stabilization, and wetland restoration retard water flow and lessen hazard. Nature needs to be integrated into the defense system, not incidental damage. Third, update GLOF early warning systems. Chitral and Gilgit-Baltistan are dotted with hazardous glacial lakes. Sensors, robotic sirens, and improved communication can cut lives but only if coupled with actual evacuation routes, shelters, and drills. Otherwise, warnings fall on deaf ears.
Fourth, make lifeline infrastructure more resilient. Bridges, culverts, power lines, and health centers are the pillars of disaster response. If they get damaged, whole valleys are inaccessible. Infrastructure in the future must be constructed to climate-resilient standards and inspected continuously for safety. Fifth, move finance from projects to performance. There are too many schemes in prospect but no resilience delivered. Budgets need to be connected to outcomes: fewer houses damaged, fewer roads swept away, fewer fatalities. If thousands of projects don’t bring measurable improvement, they are a waste of money. Sixth, ensure social protection for recovery. Poor households are driven into debt traps by floods. Community insurance, cash transfers, and safety nets may help avoid this vicious cycle. Survivors should be empowered by recovery, not further driven into poverty. Seventh, enhance regional collaboration in the Indus basin. Climate disasters don’t respect borders. Pakistan needs to bring India, China, and Afghanistan aboard for collaborative forecasting, sediment control, and flood protection. Without transboundary collaboration, downstream nations will be hostage to upstream shocks.
Conclusion
Climate change and local conflict dynamics are converging to challenge the very foundations of human security from environmental and health security to livelihoods, governance, and social cohesion. Human security, as a people-focused approach, makes it abundantly clear that such cascading risks cannot be managed by conventional notions of state-defense alone. Environmental degradation, hunger, economic uncertainty, political upheaval, and even cultural displacement all contribute to a cycle of insecurity that disempowers dignity and survival at the most fundamental level.
The 2025 tragedies in Swat, Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral being climate-vulnerable region are not exceptions; they are canaries in the coal mine, sounding alarms for a future when every monsoon can unleash cascading emergencies. Flash floods and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) tore through valleys, not just due to climatic pressures but also due to decades of uncontrolled deforestation, unplanned construction, occupation of riverbeds, and government failure. When rivers burst in Punjab and hasty evacuations took place, the script was excruciatingly well-known: citizens paid the price of the state’s failure in risk reduction, readiness, and enforcement of the rules. These disasters demonstrate the emptiness of Pakistan’s development path after independence. Thousands of projects have been initiated, billions of rupees have been expended, and still the end result is the same: reactive measures rather than preventive actions.
Rather than effective systems of enforcement, risk auditing, and public accountability, the state still resorts to press releases, commissions, and assurances. This cycle of readiness without warning, of reaction without rebound, has cost us not just money but lives, livelihoods, and 75 years of hard-won progress. Human security takes more. It asks that individuals be protected, societies consolidated, and frameworks created that prevent harm from being inflicted unnecessarily. Climate resilience must be embedded at all levels of administration, with open monitoring and mandated implementation. Lacking such a transformation, Pakistan will just keep reliving the same disaster in another district in a perpetual cycle until the next cloudburst surprises us again.
References
Al Jazeera. (2025a, July 17). Why Is Pakistan So Vulnerable to Deadly Flooding?
Al Jazeera. (2025b, August 19). Pakistan Floods and Cloudbursts Visualised in Maps and Satellite Images.
Al Jazeera. (2025c, August 28). Behind Pakistan’s Repeated Floods: Melting Glaciers, Depleted Forests.
Associated Press (AP News). (2025, June). Flash Floods in Pakistan Kill 8 after Deluge Sweeps Away Dozens.
Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human Security Now: Protecting and Empowering People. New York: Commission on Human Security.
Dawn. (2025, August 23). Two Large Lakes Formed by Glacial Outburst in Gilgit-Baltistan: Officials.
The Guardian. (2025, August 25). “It Happened in Seconds”: Residents Count the Cost of Deadly Floods That Have Left Pakistan in Crisis.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022a). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (WGII). Geneva: IPCC.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022b). WGII Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2025a, August 26). Pakistan: Monsoon Floods 2025 – Flash Update #3.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2025b, July 31). Monsoon Flood 2025: Situation Report 05.
Reuters. (2025, August 23). Pakistan Lake Formed by Mountain Mudslide Threatens “Catastrophic” Floods.
Times of India. (2025, August 28). Ravi, Sutlej & Chenab in Spate in Pakistan; 28,000 Evacuated.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994). Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York: UNDP.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2006–2008). Human Security: Seven Categories of Threats.
United Nations Development Programme – Adaptation. (2025, June). Saving Lives from Glacial Floods: Early Warning Systems in Pakistan’s North.
